GREAT results in this league! $$$
2025-06-28
比赛分析
解读理由
Shamrock Rovers VS Waterford United
Shamrock and Waterford lock horns in this Irish Premier League clash at Tallaght Stadium in Dublin, the capital of Ireland, early. Saturday morning Beijing time. However, in reality Shamrock have played 23 goals already. Waterford have played only 21 matches. The level of this league is poor by European standards, even worse than for example the Finnish Veikkausliiga.. The best young Irish players usually leave the country at a young age to build a career abroad. Football enthusiasts and us serious bettors can expect a game of better mediocre quality by this league's standards. Shamrock are, of course, the best team in terms of pure class in this league. They top the standings with 45 points but their number of expected points (xPTS) is significantly smaller. They have scored 41 goals but their number of expected goals (xG) is 39.34. They have conceded 21 goals but their number of expected goals allowed (xGA) is 24.56. Their defence has no big weaknesses but they are sometimes vulnerable to fast counter-attacks.. This is, in fact, something Waterford are pretty good at.. I expect them to defend hard here - and are not unlikely to significantly change their tactic even if they end up trailing by a margin of one goal.. Shamrock deserve to be clear favourites but the current odds of around 1.30 on the home win are much too low. The Waterford +1.5 goals handicap option is the obvious professional bettor's choice here!
Waterford are currently in 8th place with 27 points but winning their next two games they could significantly climb up the standings! Last season they finished in 7th place and have potential for some improvement.. Their number of xPTS is 29.75. Waterford have scored 24 goals and do unarguably lack some creativity and individual skill in offense. Their number of xG is 28.12. They have allowed 34 goals and have a decent defensive structure. Waterford have lost only one of their last 10 games, and just one of these 10 matches by a margin of more than one goal. In their most recent game they faced Shelbourne, the reigning champions, at home, taking a point through a 2-2 draw. Waterford were, of course, the underdogs. Shelbourne were - in all honesty - closer to winning than Waterford - recording two more big scoring chances - 4-2 to be precise. Before this Waterford beat Bohemians 2-1 at home. They were - once again - undervalued by the bookies, priced around 3.50 to win. However, they deserved the three points, having generated 0.83 more in xG! They had four big scoring chances - Bohemians had none. Shamrock have won three of their last five games but just one of their last six matches by a margin of more than one goal. In their last match they were very disappointing, losing to Bohemians 0-2 away from home. Shamrock were the favourites on the betting market, of course, but generated only 0.64 in xG! The hosts managed 1.43. Bohemians also had many more total shots on big scoring chances - 2-0 to be precise.
GOOD LUCK!
该文章通过有道机器翻译,仅供参考:
三叶草流浪者VS沃特福德联队
早些时候,三叶草和沃特福德在爱尔兰首都都柏林的塔拉赫特体育场进行了爱尔兰超级联赛的比赛。北京时间周六上午。然而,实际上三叶草已经踢了23个球了。沃特福德只踢了21场比赛。按照欧洲的标准来看,这个联赛的水平很低,甚至比芬兰的维甲还要差。爱尔兰最好的年轻球员通常在年幼时就离开祖国,到国外发展自己的职业生涯。足球爱好者和我们这些认真的投注者可以期待一场比这个联赛的标准更好的中等质量的比赛。三叶草队当然是这个联赛中最具实力的球队。他们以45分排名第一,但他们的期望分数(xPTS)要少得多。虽然打进41球,但预期进球(xG)为39.34球。他们丢了21个球,但他们的预期失球数(xGA)是24.56个。他们的防守没有什么大的弱点,但有时他们很容易受到快速反击。事实上,这是沃特福德非常擅长的事情。我希望他们在这里努力防守——即使他们最终落后一球,也不太可能显著改变他们的战术。三叶草应该是最受欢迎的,但目前主场获胜的1.30左右的赔率太低了。沃特福德+1.5球障碍选项显然是职业投注者的选择!
沃特福德目前以27分排名第8,但如果赢得接下来的两场比赛,他们的排名将大幅上升!上赛季他们只排在第7位,还有提升的潜力。他们的xpt数量是29.75。沃特福德已经进了24球,毫无疑问,他们在进攻端缺乏创造力和个人技巧。它们的xG数是28.12。他们丢了34个球,防守结构也不错。沃特福德在过去的10场比赛中只输了一场,而且这10场比赛中只有一场落后1球以上。在最近的一场比赛中,他们在主场面对卫冕冠军谢尔本,以2比2的平局获得一分。当然,沃特福德是弱者。说实话,谢尔本比沃特福德更接近胜利,他们多创造了两次进球机会——准确地说是4比2。在此之前,沃特福德主场2-1击败波西米亚人。他们再次被博彩公司低估了,定价在3.5美元左右。然而,他们配得上这三分,在xG比赛中他们比对手多出0.83分。他们有4次重要的得分机会,而波西米亚人没有。三叶草队在过去的五场比赛中赢了三场,但在过去的六场比赛中只有一场以超过一球的优势获胜。在上一场比赛中,他们非常令人失望,客场0-2输给了波希米亚人。当然,三叶草在博彩市场上是最受欢迎的,但在xG中只产生了0.64 !东道主获得了1.43分。波希米亚人也有更多的射门机会,准确地说是2比0。
好运!
作者在平台、组织、网站等发表的言论,意见,倾向等都只是作者本人的观点,和平台,组织网站等第三方没有关系。
