Rafa头像
足球分析师
葡萄牙人,全职从事体育行业多年,被誉为全世界掌握巴西足球信息最多的人。
  • 804

    方案

  • 24964

    粉丝

Wrong odd's!!! 苏超哈茨VS流浪者

2023-02-01

比赛分析

苏超

已完赛

星期四2023-02-02 03:45

解读理由

I expect a more balanced game than the odds show. Let's take advantage of the market relying too much on Rangers.

Hearts is having a very good season, this year they are not making it easy. They are fulfilling what is expected of them, being the third force in the Scottish championship, behind Celtic and Rangers. The Scottish league has a very strong home factor and the Heats have been using that like no one else. That's 8 wins in 11 games. They are a very over team, they score a lot of goals, they score against any team but they end up conceding a lot too. Only they improved that and in the last 4 games they didn't concede a goal. That's really good.

Rangers despite the second place is having a disappointing season. They are 9 points behind their rival Celtic and are unlikely to reach the title, as Celtic in 23 games only lost 5 points. The difference is in away games, where they can't be as dominant as they need to be champions in this league. In 11 away games, only 2 have won by more than 1 goal difference. They can't control the game from start to finish. In addition, the ambition is no longer the best, the season is lost. The title is a practically impossible mission and they were humiliated in the Champions League with 6 defeats in 6 games.

It will be a tough test for Rangers, Hearts has everything to surprise them and leave with a good result.

本译文使用有道机器翻译,仅供参考:

我期待一场比赔率显示的更平衡的比赛。让我们利用过度依赖游骑兵队的市场。

红心队有一个非常好的赛季,今年他们并没有让它变得容易。他们正在实现人们对他们的期望,成为苏格兰冠军联赛的第三支力量,仅次于凯尔特人和流浪者。苏格兰联赛有一个非常强大的主场因素,热队一直在利用这一点。11场比赛赢了8场。他们是一支过度的球队,他们进了很多球,他们在对阵任何球队时都能进球,但最终也会丢很多球。但他们在过去的4场比赛中没有丢球。那真是太好了。

流浪者队虽然排名第二,但本赛季表现令人失望。他们落后对手凯尔特人9分,不太可能夺冠,因为凯尔特人在23场比赛中只丢了5分。不同的是在客场比赛中,他们不能像在联赛中成为冠军那样有统治力。在11场客场比赛中,只有2场以超过1个净胜球的优势获胜。他们不能从头到尾控制比赛。此外,野心不再是最好的,季节也失去了。冠军几乎是一个不可能的任务,他们在欧冠联赛中被羞辱,6场比赛输了6场。

对流浪者来说,这将是一个艰难的考验,红心有一切可以给他们惊喜,带着一个好结果离开。


观点仅代表作者本人,不代表本站立场。
作者在平台、组织、网站等发表的言论,意见,倾向等都只是作者本人的观点,和平台,组织网站等第三方没有关系。